That way I'd have staggered years and less risk of multiple vacancies at the same time...? 

The reason I mention APS is because these are disabled seniors who are at risk of becoming homeless and APS staff can certainly point you in the right direction.  

I am OOS so looking for fewer risk investments.

You still have the risk of the lender finding out and calling the loan, but at least you can get though the refi.

Someone may get hurt but that's no reason to make bad decisions, you just need to mitigate your risk the best you can. 

By ensuring that each tenant member is capable of covering the lease by them selves, you are at less chance of risk of non-payment, should things go sideways. 

Starting to have some discussions with turnkey providers and trying to soak up all I can here on the boards.One thing I'm wondering about is whether it's possible to access a lot of data pertinent to de-risking investment decisions.For example, one of the big question marks it seems is how good and headache-free your property management company is.

No deal is risk free, but this sounds like you have a huge buffer if things don't work out or if you decide REI is not for you.

to me personally only way it makes sense is to go large.to buy 1 or 2 of these your playing Russian roulette  if its all if not most of your liquidity then i don't think personally the risk is worth it..

The numbers definitely work better in Plymouth but the risk seems much higher.