28 January 2017 | 3 replies
For utilities, they transfer on the possession day (aka Feb 1st), but the tenant should be able to call and get them put into their name in advance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99a39/99a39e2d86f7a0264997cc8f3d79ab6f165efa64" alt=""
4 November 2016 | 103 replies
As long as you use a conservative model and the numbers still work out, then it's probably a good deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b875/6b875057cf3148dda471cccbe5de874589bb3aa1" alt=""
23 October 2016 | 6 replies
You can leverage and get a couple of condos in Scottsdale or Phoenix, in A/B neighborhoods and use the VRBO model or AirBnB.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b8eb/6b8eb0c9e409cf74a8a888fa623a2eac425fd03e" alt=""
15 July 2016 | 1 reply
I originally was following the "BRRRR" model, but this condo unit is what you would call turn key.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9168b/9168be983091b1cbfa8477d6915a6a3e351bb9e8" alt=""
19 July 2016 | 11 replies
Moving into smaller models of investment so that the risk isn't as great seems to be the latest model.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96226/96226b8ae5567248544e0beb3c2f927d3a84c71b" alt=""
23 March 2016 | 8 replies
I guess its a different model than my San Antonio PM.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49ea6/49ea6a705edeb1b3b221b7ea2fc121a393ada54d" alt=""
30 March 2016 | 27 replies
I would say don't get the LEAST efficient model.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec554/ec5545c0adf9af6e2533d6fd4ad68ce76dba04df" alt=""
5 April 2016 | 2 replies
This is a business model that very common in Europe, but not so much here in my experience (at least, not for the last 30 years or so), so I'm really curious to know more about this project.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cf10/3cf10e0f237b93b680a61a0d697786daa98d0e2a" alt=""
12 April 2016 | 12 replies
Similarly, the exemption is limited to disparate impact claims based on drug manufacturing or distribution convictions, and does not provide a defense to disparate impact claims based on other drug-related convictions, such as the denial of housing due to a person’s conviction for drug possession.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe6fd/fe6fd751e5bdc26d775439a5ceeae5bdccf6c571" alt=""
27 April 2016 | 17 replies
Beyond economies of scale, value add apartments offer a forced appreciation model unlike SFRs.