In this case, those who overpaid by $72.5k should be entitled to a refund of $1,500, given that the tax rate is 2%.In summary, the sale statements for all units contain a clear record indicating that the $72.5k or $52.5k promptly went into the assessment account of the building and never entered the seller's pocket.

The house is nice but does not contain many valuables. 

If you are using one 1031 exchange to purchase a DST that may contain several assets then you are still purchasing only one DST. 

Might think of this as "Subject To's are Super, Wraps are just Wrong", investors (especially older, been there done that, investors) need to get away from the Wrap approach of having one larger obligation that contains an existing obligation in residential settings.      

If you were to use the scanner then you could just send an email containing the file to your CPA during tax time.

Not sure since mine is several independent buildings sales for exchange of one property containing 2 buildings.4.)

Not containing asbestos of course.

If it is not contained in that decree (which it should be) then you are still in title.

Look for one that has an Aluminum Oxide scratch resistant finish or a ceramic bead one.

The information contained in this post is not to be relied upon.