
4 March 2009 | 6 replies
My promise to buy is consideration enough for the contract to be valid.

29 July 2011 | 3 replies
If it was the latter case, they had a large option consideration payment and could show they were the latter and not the former, I might put them in.
8 March 2009 | 7 replies
First off, the article takes into consideration REO properties and pre-REO properties sitting empty.

28 July 2009 | 41 replies
You have to sign, as does the seller, multiple disclosures stating that the homeowner will not receive any financial consideration or benefit from the transaction.

16 March 2009 | 8 replies
My suggestion is to make sure the appraiser you use takes into consideration the fundamentals of the property (ie. location, improvements etc) and the replacement cost versus relying solely on the market sales.

14 March 2009 | 3 replies
I evaluate most deals a bit more optimistically, but that's because of local considerations.

15 March 2009 | 5 replies
Thank you CA Investor - Your thoughts will be taken in to consideration.

5 November 2009 | 21 replies
IE buying RE considerably under market value.

12 April 2009 | 6 replies
If they aren't taking you seriously you could give them 100 bucks as earnest money (I believe it's called a consideration).

18 April 2009 | 23 replies
Compare those three over 10 years, without consideration for ROI and see where you get.