data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ea25/5ea251a65b74f2eb2f9a95bf6290acaae735900a" alt=""
16 June 2018 | 5 replies
@Cade Schacher, There are a couple of exemptions for the two residence mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73e28/73e28ab4a83bff810e4f7eff678cbac78b12dc94" alt=""
2 July 2018 | 20 replies
Yes, 2 out of 5 years, but it's only one of the rules.If, like in your first example, you move out and then move back in, another rule kicks in - which will result in losing part of the exemption.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6482d/6482db43f300a948c536f173aef81805affb4a5c" alt=""
21 September 2018 | 6 replies
Quit claiming the property to him without consideration generally would bring gift tax returns into play and count toward your lifetime exemption.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50661/50661674a6d10d2811450d230ce90fafa4a387f1" alt=""
10 August 2019 | 11 replies
@Steven LangeIf it’s a business loan and non owner occupied typically the transaction is exempt from usury laws.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f59fd/f59fde246228e79a5bf10d4b44d169b2b20641d0" alt=""
9 May 2016 | 32 replies
Guess, the experts are right here.Yes if you move back for 2 years you get full 500K exemption.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80565/8056503dc312217047e58a7de76f6d6bc8c7ae28" alt=""
15 December 2015 | 42 replies
The owners have never lived in it as there has never been an exemption.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3b1/ab3b1d99b92f521e81f0be43b572c771a7ea0a2b" alt=""
1 January 2016 | 5 replies
As long as the value of the estate is under the statutory exemption limit (about 5.5M for a single person and 11M for a married couple), then the estate passes tax free upon death, and as said with the step up in basis.Whether the property is held in a trust or not will not make a difference as to the tax liability.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd23d/cd23d4c8a8546c8c34f8fa3f9733f678137d8d7a" alt=""
28 October 2016 | 6 replies
@Stephen SawrieFirst $1,000 is exempt and in addition you can deduct half of the expenses (property taxes, insurance, etc.).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edc3d/edc3d65ec90b66dce2b985fcbea767b1722ab03f" alt=""
19 June 2017 | 7 replies
@Ryan Scott Isacksen @Robert MarstonConsult an attorney to verify, but this is whai I found after a few hours research...... the "solution" is simple IF you are willing to do the followingOwner Occupy a FOURPLEX.....in Oakland that you buy..... .not a duplex or triplex.............ANDRent to Section 8 Tenants........Helpful Links................In the first line it says Section 8 Tenants are NOT COVERED by the Oakland Rent Control Ordinance https://www.tobenerlaw.com/oakland-rent-control/ http://www.tenantsunion.org/en/rights/section/subsidized-housing-section-8In the above it states thatHUD Housing and Section 8 Housing is considered Government Subsidized Housing and is therefore considered EXEMPT from Oakland Rent Adjustment Program!!!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aba6b/aba6b01272b8d3f46668ea22847c126b7372105f" alt=""
22 March 2017 | 19 replies
I have also talked to several other people in the industry before the sale to make sure of this and all agreed that I would be exempt.