Wonder what else they are trying to save costs on, although they did just replace roof.

I have thought of several approaches, and am wondering what others think and, of course, whether I have missed something and any of these approaches are specifically disallowed under Massachusetts law.1.

The property next door is a triplex in a smaller lot,  that was grand fathered in.I wonder if that easement could be argued to provide the square footage needed to qualify for a conditional use permit.

I am wondering if there has been any real solid resolution on this topic.

We're wondering if anyone knows an architect who's familiar with the process who can help walk us through the permitting process (we've done extensive renovations in the past, but never in this county).Also, would love to hear any pearls of wisdom from anyone who's renovated in SF (including working through the permitting process, anything you wish you knew before you started, regulations that are unique to SF, etc.)  

I think the more common theme you'll see from these forums is people interested in financial independence through real estate investing.

Every time the turnkey topic comes up I just wonder if those potential investors have compared the other available rent-ready options on the MLS.

I don't think a coach should do this out of the kindness of his/her heart but I am wondering what others think of this set-up?

Now I'm wondering if that is right.Not sure it matters, but another part of this is I am unable to access the "cash value" funds the insurance paid me because my bank (who has mortgages on the properties) has them "locked/froze" until the work is completed or as the work is completed).

I'm wondering if there are ways around this through some tax magic or certain entity structuring.That is awesome to hear!