I already willing to rent it for only $1000 to him so he won't be homeless. 

I had no idea but not surprised unfortunately.After giving away our beautiful neighborhoods to homeless camps now lefties wanna destroy value even more.Rent control is awful for investors not just because it makes it harder to manage but also because investors will head elsewhere and with less buyers prices will fall.It's bad for tenants and housing too, because without investors, there will be less new construction.Look how the rent control is (not) working in LA.

.  ;-) Whether millenials own currently or not does not change the supply or demand of housing. 100% (or close to obviously there are homeless) in fact live in housing.

Now we are homeless and possessionless but have no debt except the mortgage.

There's a huge need in my city with many homeless mothers and children.

But I don't want to be homeless before the process is finish.

Sorry to hear about the problems with homeless encampments downtown.

I lost everything and literally became homeless and was forced to live back in my parents' house.

This is a process, and you're not the entity that has the legal right to make judgments about something so serious as homelessness for these people in this process, and that's how it should be in a great country.A practical note: take this opportunity to make a good impression on the local magistrate who hears this case and all the parties involved, clerks, cops, etc.

I own a house on Atlanta that just turned vacant and I cannot keep the prostitutes and homeless from breaking in.