Good brokers and good lenders have pretty distinct characteristics. 

I thoroughly appreciate the nuanced distinction between "investor friendly" agent vs. an "investment realtor".Thank you for taking the time to construct this material and to upload it into this discussion thread.If I may ask, how would the interview questions be modified if one is looking for an investment realtor to locate a property suitable for house hacking?

A key distinction being that "the people" can put you in jail where "party A" doesn't have that ability.

People should be able to draw a distinction between that which is purchase price, and that which is value.  

It is a scented additive to mix into paint, and you will probably need to repaint the unit after they leave anyways.  

Perhaps some level of distinction so that tenants see me more as a manager of the property rather than the owner.

This situation is typically dealt with through an exception to the State's real estate brokerage laws, where a distinction is made between administrative tasks such as an agent/employee taking applications vs. things such as lease negotiations.Essentially you can't get around the licensing laws just by forming an entity. 

This distinction is important to handle the passive losses.

The seller's perception of themselves has no bearing on a buyers purchase money arrangements, in their opinion you're in the business and they are wholesaling, actually there is no distinction as you are the end user/owner.

I'm not sure about the distinction, but UDirect was adamant, so it must have to do with IRA regulations about SDIRA's.