New to real estate but possess a deep understanding of the responsibilities to continue to gain knowledge and remain loyal with my clients and professionally with my colleagues.  

I also purchased a multi-parcel farm property in TN where the trust who owned the property was out of money and needed cash to continue. 

I will also need cash to continue marketing campaigns, Very cash intense for equity.

Given the abatement option could you continue to occupy 15% of the building with commercial tenants while the rest of the building is converted or is that a logistical nightmare/ideally are you seeking different long term commercial tenants if you go that route? 

I will continue the journey in this thread!  

Here is a fresh example, and it actually came from another tax firm (not mine) specializing in real estate.Let me briefly tell you why I crossed out their pitch:Strategy 1: depends on your 2025 projected net income vs your 2024 net income, among many other factorsStrategy 2: can backfire amidst the uncertainty of future tax rules regarding bonus depreciation, and also ignores alternativesStrategy 3: no rush to do it before December 31stIf you decide to continue reading, I will give you a high-level overview of the most common EOY tax strategies, obviously without an actual discussion of each one.

The departing tenant says she will continue paying rent, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Quote from @Jonathan Greene: It means there is a pending bankruptcy that has to be dealt with before the sale so they continued it and there will be a new date.

This could create a disdain for flipping properties and not continuing on the path..The other option could be wholesaling it to start a path to build a war chest to go out and do the first flip with your own money down. 

Deed holder is almost always named because its the easiest party to find...deed's are recorded and public.It also sounds like the Wyoming LLC is the deed holder and the transactional costs associated with re-titling the real estate is likely going to be more expensive than continuing to maintain the Wyoming LLC.