I have a network of buyers to which I e-mail the listing, I don't market these properties to the public.

@Bob E.

When a borrower has a history of receiving rental income from the subject property since the previous tax year, the borrower must provide most recent Federal Tax Returns, including IRS Schedule E, covering the previous two (2) yearsCalculating Effective Rental Income � Any net rental income from the subject property must be added to the borrower’s qualifying gross monthly income after averaging the reported net rental income/loss reflected on Schedule E of the tax returns.� When calculating the average net rental income/loss, any depreciation, mortgage interest, taxes, insurance, and HOA dues reflected for the subject property may be added back to the net income/loss.� If the borrower has owned the subject property for less than 2 years, rental income/loss must be annualized for the length of time the property has been owned.

Rich Dad Poor DadRich Dads Cash Flow QuadrantRich Dads Increase your financial IQThe Real Book of Real EstateThe ABC’s of RE InvestingThe ABC’s of PMRich Dad RE Tax AdvantagesThe 10X RuleThe E-MythThe 4 Hour Work WeekBiggerPocketsPodCast -I hear #136 is exceptional!

The brokerage you join might have their own legal counsel already to help with this.Generally regular brokerages will not like investors trying these things because it might not be covered by their E & O policies.

Is this a good use of hard money, or am I fundamentally misunderstanding something?

Hello family,Question: Someone comes to you and says "I have more than 10 acres of land with a house and two manufactured homes on it. I want to get rid of them. I live in Phoenix and the land is in rural Grand bay Al...

We are a real estate brokerage in Davenport, and all of our agents are also investors.In addition, the majority of our clients are also investors.If there is any way I can help, just send me an e-mail...

One great takeaway from your post that I will remember is to check the trailer e brake line length and make sure it is shorter than the chains.

I don't know if I would make the same pricing decision if I were the airline, but they own the equipment and service you want to use, so they get to set the prices unless:1)  Enough airline passengers vote with their pocket book and choose to pay a little more for the bundled, (airline + restroom), price because they don't like not knowing exactly what their cost will be, or they have a philosophical problem with being charged for such a fundamental service OR2)  Enough airline passengers complain to their elected representatives and a law is passed saying that the airline cannot charge what it wants for it's services, nor can it segment it's pricing based on usage.Should it not be the airline's choice to risk the potential loss of business using #1 above in the hopes that they will attract more business?