One of my properties cost me a little more, but the other two were less than what I was paying with foremost insurance.

Tenant’s failure to maintain any item for which Tenant is responsible shall give Landlord the right to hire someone to perform such maintenance and charge Tenant to cover the cost of such maintenancePremises defined in the lease as follows:  Landlord rents to Tenant and Tenant rents from Landlord, the real property and improvements described as: address of the rental property (“Premises”).1.

I have a 4/2 1550sqft rental (1945 build) that I’m considering selling to potentially build two 2/1 ~700-800sqft houses.

We currently own one door (split acquisition and closing costs and contribute equally to management and ownership), and have split equity and cash flows from the property - also pretty standard in my experience.My question is this - I want to purchase a house hack and would like to use our current business entity for accounting purposes (tracking income / expenses / etc).

But why would you buy one property in an area you are likely to leave and then have to manage a one-off (not cost-effective)?

Hello team, I am in the process of exploring a potential investment for a potential flip.

Unless your mechanically handy your maintenance costs will eat you up.  

Add charges for rent for the remaining months, estimated utilities, estimated cleaning and repairs and cost to re-rent (in our case: cost to PM is 1/2 a month's rent).

My current primary ( scenario 1) Keep the primary for the life of the loan ( current rate is 4.5 so i dont see my self refinancing anytime soon)current home value 1,150,000Loan amount 935,000appreciation estimate 5% per year after a 28 year hold and the house is paid off I would have a house worth 4,312,000$my current mortgage is 6125$ ( piti) included My second option( scenario 2) Sell the house, walk away with $150 ,000 ish in hand and put that into a low cost index fund Rent a house elsewhere for about 3000$ ish and take the extra 3000$ im saving everymonths from not having to pay my mortgage and puting that money in the index fund as well I ran the numbers on both of these scenarios and doing what I mentioned above would break even at about 28 years meaning my stock account would be worth 4.3 million just like my house would , but the only is that holding a house for 28 year would mean 28 years of property taxes, loan interest ,home insurance and repairs etc whick I calculated to be about 1,200,000$ at minimum which raised my eyebrows to say the least Also i understand that each of these options ( stock market vs real estate ) will have there tax consequences ( long term capital gains) so any thoughts on that would be appreciated as well.  

We reviewed this deal from one of the major brokers as a potential value-added implementation, however this does not pan out with our current underwriting assumptions.