A buddy brought me some handloads.....2) Saying "Apartment 3B did not fill out the form, so we now know there are no guns on scene" is a joke and does nothing to help and may even be more of a liability for you.

It could be a liability issue if you don't, for both you and the prior tenant.

Talk to you lawyer, where I live, most waivers and release of liability forms will not hold up in court but it may be different in your region.

In my opinion I'm against this because this tenant is a huge liability in my opinion.

Too much liability for the seller to have unlimited access for the possible buyer. 

Each of these would almost always result in a different tax liability for the foreign entity. 

It is turning from a investment to a liability based on the accumulation of dead equity.

You have far to much equity in the property which turns it into a high risk liability. $150K in equity will require a $1250 (10%) return of the top of your rental income before any other expenses.

Buying cash flow is very expensive, loses money and turns a income property into a liability when the equity is generating the cash flow not th eproperty.Equity does not increase cash flow is buys cash flow...this is not investing. 

I read in the local papers of this controversy, as recently as this year, about zombie homes, where the foreclosing bank would not record change of ownership because they don't want to be responsible for liabilities as legal owners of the property such as slips and falls, squatters being injured.