The hard part is finding buyers willing to participate in a 90 fishing expedition while the listing agent tries to figure out what the bank is going to take for the property.

Where they do go is dealing fairly, reasonably, both parties being reasonably informed, neither party is dealing from an undue disadvantage, or where one party may coerce another into doing something a reasonable person would not do.

If the service needs to return a third-time - because vehicles were not moved - there is a surcharge which we pass along to those tenants whose vehicles impeded the snow removal. 

The eviction will name all the parties on the lease (including you) as well as all others known and unknown to reside in the unit.

In addition, you may want to contact a board member/attend a board meeting and ask about future plans, ask the last time the reserve fund has been evaluated by a third party (there are regulated ratios that must be maintained). 

Again, no sense of urgency on their part. I

First was an REO, second was a short sale, third was an auction property.  

The third and last option I am considering , is to use the money from a Cash-Out refi , and purchasing ( All in cash) a Lower end property ... $15,000 = $20,000 ( this includes all the repairs as well ) .On a property in this price range in my area... there not in the best of areas/neighborhoods .... but the rents are still in the $500 - $600 per month range, and I will at least own the property outright and will cashflow a nice profit per month, while also increasing the properties value ( by painting, re-flooring, etc. ), so that if I ever go to sell...

., the court found that in determining unconscionability, the trial judge may consider: 1) the amount of the proposed rent increase; 2) the landlord’s expenses and profitability; 3) how the existing and proposed rent compare to rents charged at similar rental properties in the geographic area; 4) the relative bargaining position of the parties; and 5) based on the judge’s general knowledge, whether the rent increase would shock the conscience of a reasonable person.In my opinion if you're basing the increase on market conditions and not on trying to take advantage of anyone or increase the rent as a way to eliminate a tenant you'll probably be fine.

The other part is that the current manager is literally just collecting a pay check and is never onsite.