Actually we all agree on that... my issue is with the folks that have no money, don't intend to use money that they control, and still consider themselves to be, and represent themselves, as investors.

I buy revenue streams represented by buildings.

Thinking being that the banks would be motivated to cut a deal with a new person once they realize what a mess the loans are and that I'd represent a legitimate opportunity to close the books on this once and for all- Option term would give me enough time to negotiate with banks, e.g. 6 months or so- Seller would give me an exclusive right to purchase the property- Option fee would be nominal, say $100 at first and the rest would be payable upon successful negotiations with the banks (she wants to pay off her credit card debts, $30k)Questions:- does it make sense to structure it this way?

They don't represent "investor-only types" and the majority of their rentals were once owner occupied.

Based on my findings I helped change are policies to represent the market, so our policies were market.

I would also represent the situation as "I totally appreciate where you are coming from.

I had a potential deal on the line from a personal representative of an estate.

Typically getting paid to represent people in real estate requires a license.

JJ---the chart represents Basic (CP1010) and Special (CP1030) Special is "all risk" which means that unless that which causes the damage is an "excluded peril" (think flood, EQ, and others) there is coverage.

A an agent is hired by a person to represent them in the marketing and obtaining of offers for their property.