
31 January 2013 | 15 replies
Since he is a business, you might have to go to regular court where he will have to pay for a lawyer and you can represent yourself.

28 December 2012 | 22 replies
For example, I'm an investor first-and-foremost, but a lot of investors who I know ask me to list and represent them on the buy-side because they know I have the investing expertise.

21 December 2012 | 7 replies
So, we give up our commission in order to attract short sale deals.And then the extra money we make by representing investor friends of ours covers our license costs (my wife, my project manager and I are all licensed now) and any other marketing that we do (like sending cookies and gifts to all the agents we work with a couple times per year).In the end, we're using all our "extra" money coming from being licensed to cover all our marketing costs and extra costs associated with getting deals, so our rehab profits don't need to be used for this purpose.

5 February 2013 | 173 replies
Except that a recent poll by the National Educators Association (which represents about 3 million teachers) found that only about 20% of teachers are in favor of this.

27 February 2013 | 9 replies
I filled out a form through Quickenloans and the representative called me 30 seconds later.

13 January 2017 | 13 replies
If an entity is named as manager, It is usually helpful to also state the name of the authorized representative of the entity who will be acting for the entity as manager.7

30 March 2013 | 68 replies
Actually we all agree on that... my issue is with the folks that have no money, don't intend to use money that they control, and still consider themselves to be, and represent themselves, as investors.

23 April 2013 | 13 replies
I buy revenue streams represented by buildings.

20 September 2013 | 1 reply
Thinking being that the banks would be motivated to cut a deal with a new person once they realize what a mess the loans are and that I'd represent a legitimate opportunity to close the books on this once and for all- Option term would give me enough time to negotiate with banks, e.g. 6 months or so- Seller would give me an exclusive right to purchase the property- Option fee would be nominal, say $100 at first and the rest would be payable upon successful negotiations with the banks (she wants to pay off her credit card debts, $30k)Questions:- does it make sense to structure it this way?

13 September 2013 | 4 replies
They don't represent "investor-only types" and the majority of their rentals were once owner occupied.