I just checked the forms the city had me sign for my plans, it just says "certain restrictions" apply if I had had a tenant in the last 3 years.

The rental market has been great for me....I only have turnover every 3-5 years, and last one was 1.5 years ago and I got a ton of inquires, and the rent has continued to rise quickly.

:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+, zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680, some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

If it were me it would have been taken care of last time.

Is it as simple as just living in it for 2 of the last five years?

The last partner's property is a single-family home in their LLC.

(CNBC).Today’s Interest Rate: 6.97%(👇 .19% from this time last week, 30-yr mortgage)Well, I’m sick as a dog, which is a dumb saying since my dog never gets sick.

It's funny... beginners read all the literature written about the housing market from 3 years ago and they say, 1% rule, lots of cash flow, but don't realize none of that works when the housing prices have doubled the last 2 years, as have interest rates.  

Last year around this time my dad was sick and I have to move overseas since he died to handle a few family stuff.

Seller finance and only pay taxes on the portion received the first year (Maybe zero if they don’t last 9 months)Lastly they might be able to just rack up the bills up paid and have them paid by the estate.