Obviously the great PM's reduce that risk, but there is always some amount of risk for it.Also, hidden clauses that require the landlord to use the PM for selling the property. 

My strengths, low debt-low enough to payoff half in next several months, resiliency-I did door to door for almost 10 years, good credit-700+, time, energy, passion.My goals...

That will just reduce your income production. 

I was just thinking if someone came to you and said they sold a rental, that seems a little challenging since I assume you would have to look at their previous tax returns.It does not stay the same, it is reduced by depreciation each year. 

I ran some analysis a few months back where I discovered that the cost associated with selling & 1031 roughly reduces the short-term return by 3% annually.

Ren to own strategy attracts better tenants, reduces landlords maintenance cost, gives some people home and gives the landlord more cash upfront.Thanks for reading and replying!

Your cash flow is reduced, but you have a large sum of money that even the debt free cash flow would take forever the equal.The question should start with how much money would you get either way, at what cost per month, and would they still be cash flow positive?

No luck is reaching out and speaking to four different lawyers and only one of them actually investing any time or energy into it. 

If you don't like the opportunistic people, don't give them your precious time and energy.   

There are probably local groups in your city or state huddling together to figure out how to reduce the amount of money that can be made via real estate.