20 December 2016 | 10 replies
Hi Everyone,So I'm in the middle of trying to execute my first flip.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0b82/e0b82b13a2484f367ae4099328bc7d9c15694c93" alt=""
2 January 2017 | 6 replies
This could put you in a vulnerable position where you are negative cash flow and potentially forced to sell. 10% on 5k a month is an extra 500/month.
21 December 2016 | 10 replies
@Brandon Henry so I take it from your post the you each own 1/2 of a duplex so neither party can execute the plan without the other.I don't do basement dig outs but have investigated it a couple of different times for different situations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e09/13e093a0149105efe73952b68eda11884a38c46b" alt=""
21 December 2016 | 5 replies
Likewise, the plan may not receive a benefit from you such as the provision of services such as rehab work.All transactions must be executed at arm's length.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fea9/0fea9215d0005d95e0b4ac74d6b0610dc4bdb230" alt=""
4 March 2017 | 7 replies
That mindset was promoted by a known scientologist and while catchy and exciting, it creates a very dangerous, high risk mindset that's rarely, if ever, executed longer than a few days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4badd/4badd50c632da34bdab8da8b67bfa449a1c1c806" alt=""
23 December 2016 | 5 replies
The new LLC owner, the buyer hasn't changed, it's still the LLC...under new ownership, executes the buy in the name of the LLC.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32a7d/32a7d2cb1abecae4a2690a9a3f61fe29029ab5e4" alt=""
22 December 2016 | 6 replies
But I wouldn't even bother executing for that little cash.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a88/10a8827aafc30267f990e0e13486bcb553f56134" alt=""
26 December 2016 | 13 replies
Legally binding obligations with respect to the contemplated transaction will only arise upon the signed execution of the RE-23 agreement.Thank you for your consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19c11/19c111e1d3db1dccea917c602de2de7a7385d32d" alt=""
22 December 2016 | 6 replies
The above scenario sounds like the order is: appraisal, offer, accepted purchase price, inspection, close, but my experience is that the order is: offer, accepted purchase price, appraisal/insepection, close.I look forward to hearing from anyone who has been able to execute this strategy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/216e2/216e2dcb813faf8513a8b628852f11a9f6607cf1" alt=""
23 December 2016 | 4 replies
You've given me more piece of mind in one of the last road-blocks before executing on a deal.