If my client wants to pay it its up to them but I wont.. two reasons one is personal I feel most sellers this is there only asset or majority of their net worth and its just unconscionable but 90% of wholesaler frankly its about them they could careless and I know others will get on here and say they are not that way.. but as one who funds these deals probably over 100 deals a year with a wholesaler fee on it..

Any major headaches that come with that?

With my LTRs I have been switching to all tenant paid utilities after my first winter where I discovered the majority of my tenants were setting the heat at 78 (which is unreasonable in Northern New Hampshire) and leaving their windows open in -20 degree weather.

I know this is not all owners, but a majority fall into this camp.

that we’ve learned in our 24 years, managing almost 700 doors across the Metro Detroit area, including almost 100 S8 leases:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

What we came up with was an infill product that matches what three story walk ups are in the multifamily market.

Dig into reverse mortgages before pulling the trigger on anything, specifically HECM's (FHA product).

I believe the owners with the majority ownership share forced the others to sell, but they weren’t cooperating. 

I know the production homebuilders sell lots way in advance, but I think that's a whole different ballgame. 

If the way to increase the selling value of a MFH is to increase NOI by increasing income or decreasing expenses; why are the majority of sellers putting their properties on the market with under market rent?