I know larger public company apt buildings doing 21% increase between tenants to combat regulations... 

My concerns:Squatters and having to evict.Someone getting "injured" and suing Someone copying a key and then robbing the place later onHave any of you found a way to combat these concerns or am I overthinking the whole thing?

Tenant is combative and obviously overwhelmed.

No federal disclosures from a landlord whose job is to combat environmental concerns and toxic hazards.

A high interest rate environment is the Fed's way of combating hyperinflation.

True, but we have to identify exactly how it is being done and combat them on that level.

Hello BP community!I was unable to find a good 1-800 number for analysis paralysis, so I figured this would be a great place to start. Thank you for building such an amazing place with a treasure trove of information,...

thanks in advanceTo combat the SS or FHA self sufficiency rule its relatively simple because its basically a ratio you need to meet or exceed.This ratio is:75% of the Gross rents (lower of market rents by appraiser or current rents) for all units (even the owner occupied one) must be equal to or greater than the PITI on the property (prin/interest/taxes/insurance).A quick rule of thumb I use to eye ball these types of deals and its not 100% accurate but its probably 95% is that the  gross monthly rents of all units must equal .90% of the sales price with FHA (assuming 3.5% down & prevailing FHA rate + FHA MI/etc) in order to meet this SS rule.When a property dips below .90% rent to value ratio or rent to sales price we seem to have an issue with this SS rule.So what does this all mean behind all the lending hoopla? 

As strange as it sounds, he was combative about signing the document, even though it was his building that was encroaching.

The sale was completed while they were down range in a combat zone.