Obviously I'd include some language saying something to the affect of "sales price may vary based upon square footage and condition of property" to ensure there is some leeway.I can see Pros to including it because everyone who called would know that I wanted a discount and wouldn't waste my time calling since they'd be ready for it, however I do know I'd likely receive fewer upfront calls and would not be able to negotiate people down on price.Any thoughts on this strategy or has anyone tried this?

Plus, you will have fewer profits overall. 

We learned that refi on investment property is more expensive than refi on primary residence, and you have fewer protections in place that primary residences qualify for, so definitely pay attention to the details, disclosures, and fees.     

Great Danes: While not normally regarded by the general public as a dangerous dog, this breed has been responsible for several deaths.

The danger with this strategy is sometimes the investor miscalculates the ARV and ends up only being able to payoff a fraction of the line, but thats okay too.

If Tenant A paid a portion and wants their portion back, they have to work that out amongst themselves.Moving tenants in and out is a dangerous game.

This is an arena for experts with many potential dangers for the novice investor.Why did an investor not purchase for the $65,444 at foreclosure instead of the $79000? 

The buyer can simply walk away - and no tax savings are worth it.Reversing it and then immediately re-doing it can be considered fraudulent by the IRS.Also, the IRS requires that the original sale and its reversal happen in the same tax year.If you do want to swim in these dangerous waters, get an experienced attorney first.

Weak applicants have fewer choices and will accept an over priced unit from a landlord willing to overlook their weaknesses. 

What are other potential dangers for investors with leverages in an economy downturn?