I'll save myself dozens of hours every year and probably still get the same result as if I had personally reviewed with each tenant.

I'm curious about something though, if the PMC has been given a clear profile of what a qualified tenant looks like and they put someone in a unit that they haven't fully screened or for some other reason slips through the cracks, shouldn't they have some financial responsibility for the lost rents, cost of evictions and any required rehab work that is a result of that? 

Not the two years you read about on google search results from 2+ years ago.

I just wanted to consider the end result if that changed anything in the long run.

It takes time, but you would be suprised at the results. 

OR, watch a few YouTube videos  produced for self promotions and write a check and then pray t all works out!!!

Unfortunately, the execution of the program and effectiveness of the program is not achieving the desired result, in my experience.I have had really bad tenants that happen to be part of the voucher program and I have had (and currently have) really great tenants on the voucher program.

On the other hand, I lived in a condo once where the owners were majority young professionals, didn't want or afford high HOA fees, resulting in frequent budget busting special assessments.

Pillars will be established to avoid damage to the postal box.Investment offeringWith capital improvements of well over $100,000, asset repositioning, and asset stabilization we believe this will have a final result of a stable and prosperous asset.Current Asset financials (Annual figures):7 rented lots - $18,4801 Manager rented lot - $013 Park owned homes - $68,120Total gross income = $93,200.

Interest is only deductible in Canada if the money is used for income producing assets.Chris