@Kim Tucker was heavily involved with this issue and would have more details, if anybody wants to know more about this.

If you can take your $60k and reinvest it in a market you have a competitive advantage in, you'll probably do a lot better than investing it in an area that is already heavily populated with investors who live in their market. 

Then there's developers here who are heavily involved in Israel's bond market....  

Especially when the government taxes us so heavily in order to pay for them to continue doing so!

My company doesn't offer a match on 401(k) dollars so it makes the decision a bit easier.Before real estate I was investing heavily into the stock market.

I don't care who you are, that is a very smart move.We will see on Tuesday how it all plays out but it is interesting to see people rely so heavily on the characterization of political candidates as "stupid" or as some Democrats have tried to use lately "b-tch" or "whore", especially when they are factually wrong in how they came about that characterization.

Depending on the property, and the area, I might assume as high as 60% for heavily 1BR units.

Constitutional rights, especially those of resident aliens, are heavily affected by Supreme court decisions.

Mom is heavily involved in different charities and public groups around town.

It would be assanine to put all your eggs in one basket, just ask folks who invested heavily in Phoenix, or Las Vegas, or Denver, or Silicon Valley, or Orange County in 1995-2005.If you all want to have a smart a$$ exchange, I can hang with you all day long.