There can be insinuating circumstances that can justify not occupying the property such as a job transfer or a life changing circumstance, but technically the bank requires you to occupy it when you say you’re getting an owner occupied loan.

If they are professionals, they can justify those charges and you may change your mind and decide to work with them.

I'm not sure if they would give me enough write offs to justify it yet.

Fees should be clearly stated, easy to understand, and justifiable.

Are you getting it far enough under market to justify those terms?

Or you're going to buy and wait and wait for rents to come up and interest rates to drop to justify your purchase (in the meantime, you'd have probably made more in mutuals). 

It would be terrible for him to take out a loan to furnish it and then not make enough (or zero) rental income to justify it.

It would still have been a profit, but not enough to justify the time and expense.

I'm surprised you're even finding deals in a place like Westlake and Rocky River, maybe I can see Medina or North Olmstead, but the previously mentioned are all at prices I couldn't justify.

Anyone could use that to justify almost anything......