Implement cleanliness rewards.

People can debate whether the 4% SWR rule is the right number (perhaps 3% is safer, or perhaps a larger number if you know how to take bigger risks for the bigger reward).There's also no law requiring you to spend 4% (or 3% or some other number) of your money each year, not even any minimum distribution requirement from some kinds of retirement accounts.

Getting BETTER depreciation "rewards", clearing same or more net cash-flow, with a whole lot MORE equity gain potential, and removing the entire risk factor of maintenance / cap-x. 

Clay soil, tons of predators, heat waves that fry the veggies on the vine, and Fire Season - thin skinned flesh picks up the flavor, and it is Not a pleasant one....but, it's so rewarding watching something survive all that because you helped!

Got credit card reward points as well.  

It is one, of many components of the return, but it is not the total return of the asset.You're 100% right re: risk/reward. 

Keep up the good work Tim and may the good Lord reward you for giving back to those in need.

There is a high barrier to entry in coastal California, but if you don't actually need the cash flow to live on right now, you'll be rewarded in more equity gains than the cash flow you'd get out of state in most cases.

Reward: Compare the risk profile of flipping vs. buy-and-hold.

No, she doesn't deserve to be rewarded.