It may well be that regardless of how I treat Business Property, overall profit is so high that my Personal Exclusion will cover and realize $250K under 121 regardless. 

The only exclusive portion of any meeting is "Executive Session" which is often used by Boards to hide some of their activity.

The person is not required to work exclusively for the other individual or entity;3.

I was under the impression that since I owned the property for over 3 years that I would have a higher tax rate if I sell, than if I would have sold for under 2 1\2 years.I think you are mixing things up a bit; thus sounds like you were looking at the Section 121 exclusion. 

Fair housing laws dictate that housing must be made to everyone in a fair basis with no exclusions to protected classes.

Would your system have only exclusive inventory not advertised anywhere else?  

We basically are exclusive cab drinkers (if you couldn't already tell- ha!)

For example, if you are exclusively going to be pursuing 3-4 bedroom single-family homes in a college neighborhood and are going to focus on college rentals which you are going to hold for the next 7-10 years is a pretty defined focus that allows a lender to know you have done your homework and know what is going to best suit your personality.  

Any Canadian company whose income is primarily/exclusively from "passive" sources (rental income; interest, dividends, bonds, mortgages, etc) does not qualify for the small business tax rate afforded "active" CCPCs.  

I wasn't comfortable continuing to invest exclusively in the Bay Area where you can't even get the 1 percent rule....or even half that.....The next person that tells me they bought an $800,000 property in San Francisco and are getting $8,000 per month in gross rent will be the first.