Sheesh I couldn’t argue with her there.

@Michael Ealy I would argue that if you are double closing then you aren't even wholesaling, that is an entirely different beast. 

Now, if your business growth is not capital constrained, then you could argue it makes sense to deploy capital on the underlying real estate.

I can theorize all I want in my head, but it's hard to argue with real numbers.

But, I'm not going to argue the point, if push ever comes to shove you'll find out.

Why people may argue the points here can be from various motivations, could be they just want to continue and won't admit the pitfalls, lots of different motivators.I have no dog in the fight, I don't do anything but pass on advice without any expectation at all of any gain from what I advise.

Oh well, no use arguing this anymore.

One can argue that the tax deduction of mortgage interest is more of a curse than a blessing.

There is really no reason to argue about semantics.

BTW, it doesn't matter to the seller/homeowner how much the house eventually short sells for.As you know CC, it could be argued that mitigating the loss to the bank will increase the likelihood that the borrower gets their situation resolved with a better chance of no or reduced deficiency.