I'm excited, but I am having a tough time finding an insurance policy on the place.I thought I had this all nailed down, but I just got a cancellation notice in the mail that states the policy will be cancelled due to failure to comply with an inspection.The property is managed, and the manager claims she had a tough time coordinating a single time when all four tenants could meet with the inspector.

They seem identical to me with the difference being that i need to check against Dodd Frank for seller finance, but at the same time I can take title and claim the asset and equity on my balance sheet.What are thoughts on using one vs the other?

I would be cautious with any deal that offers only a Quit Claim to grant you an interest.  

My ads are directed towards residential properties, but I guess it wasn't clear enough.Now, I have a seller that claims that they have to sell the property immediately because his father his dying and needs to leave the area.

In which case, you are basically co-insuring the property, because you will only get a portion of the payout you would otherwise receive, even on small claims.

In retrospect, we would have rather paid the $367 Cash Advance instead of requesting a research ticket because of which they are claiming we owe them $1321 more.

Its really just a rehabbed vacant unit with no history to back up the performance claims..

The seller's reluctance is the tax hit and where to move the money after closing.His gross rents are $5000 per mo. and claims to net "a couple" thousand each month after paying PITI but not sure he factors in repairs or the value of his time spent toward management.My partner suggest financing the deal at 7% using a wrap around and balloon. 

You have to find her and ask her if she would Quit claim herself off the deed and or give her half the proceeds of the house

TSC Capital claims to help people raise private capital for investing in Mortgage Notes.