So the scenario plays out like this when you get your final bill there is an add-on fee which was not agreed-upon or discussed.

If you don't need the additional income, looking to generate long term wealth, tax sheltering benefits, etc buying for appreciation may come more into play.

This may not work if you have to give notice etc but everyone involved from the judge to the bailiff new what was going on and the games that were being played and helped get it done.  

This could be finding off market deals, distressed properties or possibly development plays. 

If your goals are wealth building, then finding a market with great appreciation can be the better play (Hawaii being a decent choice for that and much of CA being some of the greatest for that). 

Interested to see if they can actually use non-vaccination as a grounds for application denial or if this turns more into a PR play. 

The lender requires and the state regulations on insurance companies come into play.

I just started working at my current company 6 months ago and before I played professional basketball overseas.

(Wink Wink) You can't play all day.... but you sure can Hustle while you play! 

With that said, sometimes sellers just want to get out of the property and are turned off by subject to deals.I would try to explain the process to him and see if he bites, playing around with favorable terms such as any DP requirement or loan duration?