I also want to add, if the deal is really good and you're worried, I'd take the risk and if they don't agree with your proposals then evict, just make sure you get enough of a discount to account for the cost of evicting and lost rent.

It was settled through a settlement offer I proposed.

Read through ten cases, front to back, noting the forms and documents of record and the types of problems that are encountered and the solutions that are being proposed. 

I feel I have some leverage as I don't think there's a huge line of people willing to buy this entire portfolio, but all the new remedies they proposed aren't things I can do before closing..eg flip part of the property, increase rents on other tenants, etc.

Since state legislation moves many times off the radar and at a much quicker  pace things have a way of sneaking into law and you need to verify locally that Utah still follows federal practice.  

How do you like your proposals; extreme itemization?

Like so many other examples of statist legislation, this attempt at "progressive engineering" will have unintended consequences.  

Does anyone know if the city has passed the short-term proposals they were discussing back in February?

It is your legal responsibility to know and understand the legislation governing the operation of your business. 

The dollar for dollar offer proposed was just that.