This is bogus if buyer and seller are independent parties (if the parties are associated then I understand setting true value) as there is usually a reason for the discount purchase (risk items like unpermitted work, crazy low rents in rent controlled area, hoarder, heavy need of rehab, etc).  

I wish we lived in a world where people didn’t want to do us harm but that’s just not reality, and as long as that remains true i will be a very vocal advocate for armed, and trained, Real Estate professionals.

Hey man, great report, however the numbers look a little too good to be true.

With a budget of $130k I would make sure that you still have at least 6 months of reserves after the purchase.I would also be careful in certain areas where the cash-flow looks too good to be true..

That may be true, but don't make those decisions before sitting down with her as a family and showing her all of the properties, what they make, what their liabilities are, what their values are, and where they are.

Would that be true if we made the new property in FL our primary? 

So, they should have cut yesterday by 100, and they should have cut in July, but they don't want to crash the Markets (their true masters-as they are appointed by politicians beholden to asset owning donors).

Is that true ?

If it sounds good to be true, it most likely is.

(We settled anyways because the settlement was cheaper than what my attorney bills would have been to defend against this absurd suit, so I didn't test the true strength of the LLC)