26 March 2017 | 11 replies
Equity value through DP and appreciation will put you deep into negative cash flow.Find a multi unit that will be lower risk having multiple tenants.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9708a/9708afc65f5a91e3357f90e942ba16cbbb054f5e" alt=""
30 March 2017 | 6 replies
I do think that as a result however, the overall attitude is disproportionately negative and like you said, there's often very vague information.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/158b7/158b7200259e32677d01147a45ff4a66c087f9d0" alt=""
9 April 2017 | 3 replies
In order for there to be conflict you are insinuating there is a negative effect to the Association or other owners from the board members actions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/000aa/000aa949d1c80f1bf0010f9927813139ff33ea79" alt=""
26 March 2017 | 8 replies
@Ken P. experience beats statistics everyday.
25 March 2017 | 2 replies
They go in knowing (or should know) they may be Cash Flow negative while living there for one year minimum.
7 April 2017 | 27 replies
However, as someone who was born and raised here in Wilmington and now invests here, I can say that the first thing I noticed is that the majority of your comments are very negative about the area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaea5/aaea53ce58e419418026fef8ec92304722bf50f9" alt=""
28 March 2017 | 3 replies
If we disclose early on to a broker that we would like to start our own brokerage down the road would this be a positive/negative, or what?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e537a/e537ad8d8ee7a2051ab07138ffd3862dba369e31" alt=""
31 March 2017 | 5 replies
Which gives me a negative bottom line of $1,525.00.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f95ff/f95ffcb7d284c79913dc7bac8934068ca8393760" alt=""
27 March 2017 | 23 replies
Vacant land at this price point is negative cash-flowing, taxes and POA fees (if any) along can quickly turn this good deal into a loser.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/877f0/877f0f2d99f0183992cd917a90602ab3a4a4acb1" alt=""
28 March 2017 | 10 replies
Anyone that tells you they have a certain ratio are basing that number on yesterday or today expenses not on the full life of the property. 40% would be good, depending on the type of property, 50% is the statistical average based on tens of thousands of properties over many decades of collecting data.