As an investor, neutral is your friend.

Transactions are the bottom line to me, so a pretty good measuring stick of ability to produce.

I think the bottom line would be to offer the sellers their price subject to the debt.

Especially if I'm right in assuming that would help stimulate the market's rebound... return confidence to those who can buy but aren't for fear we aren't at the bottom, that they couldn't resell if they had to in 3 or 5 years... allow those who want to move but can't to be able to, to go where jobs are, to go from "under employed" to fully employed... to convince investors who still aren't sure about real estate to chase the market and poor more money into it...

By this I mean more cost-efficient vendor list, less expenses since it hurts our "bottom line".

Ton of negative reviews on yelp towards the bottom. 

The bottom line is: owning and managing rental properties is largely a service business.

Schmidt's babies are increase internet regulations with net-neutrality (doing away with the first amendment) and the pro-global warming scam, but I digress.The topic is economic collapse, and it will because of the growing unfunded liabilities now at $100 trillion and $18 trillion /yr operating debt, & growing every year, and a collapse in the economy will not be as a result of advances in technology. 

A few tips..You can tag people by typing @ before you type their name, then clicking their name when it pops up at the bottom of the message box.

You just need to keep looking-they are out there, trust me.If you are investing out of state, a PM will not kill your bottom line but improve it, if they are good, by placing well-qualified and responsible tenants, minimizing vacancies, and attending to deferred maintenance as it comes up.