You have nothing to lose by calling a professional.

You will lose money on this (hopefully you have the minimal resources for it not to bankrupt you) and for the rest of your life you'll tell anyone who listens that real estate is just a bad, bad, bad investment strategy.You jumped into a very tight, very difficult, very high-risk niche specialty without studying it carefully, without having worked with a more experienced investor, without a network and a team in place, without giving yourself a real chance to go through the learning curve.

While they can be quite loyal, they are usually not easily trained and tend to lose focus if a threat draws their attention.

I Like Multi Family just because it scales faster and you don't have to worry about losing 100% of the rent every time you have tenant turn over.

My goal is to not lose money these two months. 

If you have something to buy it's worth it, but don't force yourself to buy something you normally wouldn't consider...With that said you can be little flexible seeing as you're hypothetical buying power is greater (by whatver you'd "lose" to taxes).

Here's an example: look at how much of the job growth in SF is based on companies that lose billions of dollars a year and have no chance of ever making money.

I understand that its not mathematically the best solution because we lose tax efficiency, yada yada yada. 

We want to keep the group on the smaller size (capped at 10) as to not lose focus. 

Does anyone know of a way to write these Agreements so that I can waive the enforcement of some payments without losing the right to enforce the Agreement based on later breaches of the Agreement?