not a bad consideration though. 

His perspective is "The People that made the most money during the California gold rush were the guys selling shovels and pickaxes to the gold-seekers.

Tenant B as per your new clause... the end... you are no longer stuck in the middle nor are you the bad guy (you will however still retain the right to pursue Tenant B via fines or the same, but ONLY IF YOU CHOOSE and can be done so in conjuction with other Tenants)I hope this helps, I send you DM on BP, I would truly appreciate if you can assist. 

Breaking even when considering vacancy and capex isn't necessarily bad. 

If you don’t sign up now- you will 💯 % miss the boat on this opportunityBonus points:- blame the person for not implementing your strategy- blame others when things go bad.- it’s a course you paid for so there is no recourse when you eventually fail miserably. https://youtu.be/KyUHsoBdXT0

Account ClosedThere’s no correct answer to this, just having a discussion.There are pros and cons points and counter-points to every perspective.It appears your preference for REITs is more about liquidity issues than vetting issues, which I understand.I would suggest illiquidity can be an advantage as it prevents investors from making sudden moves when times get bad.

That area is just as bad with bugs.

alot of myths going around , just wanna get your guys perspectives. i plan on doing section 8 in jax FL just doing my research if the demand is there. thanks , allen

(This is why I say it's a bad idea.

Just general experience that they pretty never cover 100% of what "I" want, and ALWAYS have "too many clicks" or an interface that doesn't work for me...For what its worth, setting up Excel for this isn't that bad.