There was a sales contract that included an exercisable option to purchase.

I have performed this exercise a number of times using my own personal credit cards, and other lines of credit.

Ejectment does not just physically eject someone, it also legally ejects them.

He was mentally not as sharp as he once had been (but fortunately was still functioning well mentally, his issue was almost all physical which may be even more frustrating). 

The only way a seller would have that information is if you physically provide it.If you have only disclosed prequalification through Lender A, you would only need to provide a denial letter from that lender.

Nobody tells you how to achieve the second phase of the project, the sale of the property—which is the whole point of the exercise.

As Jonathan noted above, start physically viewing real estate.

So you can decide whether due-on-sale is a big enough risk to make it worth getting a more expensive commercial loan like you have been, or keeping the property title in your personal name.As with a trust, lenders do not exercise the "due on transfer/sale" clause when real property is transferred to the same individuals in an official capacity (i.e.

Typically, when funds acquire loans, they assume delinquency/default risk in exchange for earning a yield on their investment.Yet this would work differently – it’s a request to purchase debt alongside a corresponding put option/insurance policy.From the buyer’s perspective, as long as the seller remains solvent, with sufficient liquidity for any exercised options, it’s a risk-free investment.

There is a clear bifurcation in Cap rates between infill, stabilized assets (7%) to properties that are located in tertiary markets or those assets that are still in a lease-up (<70% physical occupancy).