@Brittani-Kaye Lorenzen Greetings,If you are looking to do an arms length transaction (straight up sale) paying her taxes will not be a unique selling point because the taxes will have to be paid regardless when property switches hands.

She has the ability to give away, gamble away or shoot the 60K directly into her arm any time.

This week, I armed my self with the advice bestowed to me in the forms and set to battle it out at my first foreclosure auction! 

I know it worked for me for years.Lastly a lot of those that are heavy into tax sales have a marketing arm that is pretty hard to impossible to replicate..

Think about it this way,  would you give a chainsaw to someone who has already cut off an arm and leg with one?

New is better suited to arm chair investors that do not wish to put the additional effort into saving money.

NEVER get an ARM loan.

They are quoting: RCW 59.18.900 Severability—1973 1st ex.s. c 207.If any provision of this chapter, or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act, or its application to other persons or circumstances, is not affected.This is what I would send themRCW 59.18.200 Tenancy from month to month or for rental period—Termination—Armed forces exception—Exclusion of children—Conversion to condominium—Notice.(1)(a) When premises are rented for an indefinite time, with monthly or other periodic rent reserved, such tenancy shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month, or from period to period on which rent is payable, and shall be terminated by written notice of twenty days or more, preceding the end of any of the months or periods of tenancy, given by either party to the other.Unless they are in the armed forces and deployed,  they only need to give you a 20 day notice from the end of their lease. 

In my last closings, my attorney office explicitly told me they do not provide wire instructions via email.

While the insurance arms of the banks will sometimes undercut other providers, my first question would be whether the coverage was the same between the two policies?