@Robin ReeseBeware that some courts have held that these types of arrangements, if they don't work, require a foreclosure process if the tenant refuses to move or demands some repayment of fees they paid in.

At a high level, the transaction would look like this: Investor A loans money to Investor B from their SDIRA.Investor B loans money to Investor A from their SDIRA.Both loans have the same terms, backed by the real estate of each borrower.I have confirmed that this is type of arrangement does not violate the rules governing SDIRAs.Is anyone else in BP using this strategy?  

In my case, this risk control makes this type of arrangement far less risky than the typical mortgage (collateralize) loan.

Just trying to think of a fair arrangement.

It depends on the lender and the arrangement.

I would be happy to arrange a meeting for you if you are interested. 

Either type of lender could still say no to that arrangement if they wanted to.  

Joe Fairless has a podcast episode on loan sponsorship.

Also President has not signed paperwork i sent to him on payment arrangements to pay his arrears also have a meeting today Vice President wants to increase dues 20 to 50% due to others not paying im the only one who has a mortgage so it will hurt my cashflow alot, and i just received a call from Vice President about our meeting today he wants me to call the meeting to order and state i vote yes on everything if we get disconnected because the president is always claimimg phone issues but i dont trust the vice president i believe he is playing sides.  

If all checks out I contact them and make arrangements to sign the lease.