
28 December 2013 | 30 replies
They will not cross lines of being legal council but they will give you some regulatory background on the matter and may take a complaint from you on him.The collection of the will fall under civil law.

30 December 2013 | 23 replies
agents aren't prosecuted because they aren't breaking the law, the buyers are breaking the law.

29 December 2013 | 8 replies
(In California, illegal immigrants are legal!!!)

29 December 2013 | 29 replies
They have the right to know what the trustees authority and obligations are in relation to the trust.Even if the creator of the trust is smart, or well advised, and has that authorization in a separate document, that authorization will disclose the creator of the trust and honestly that is all that is needed to be off to the races.Trusts were not created in common or current law to guarantee privacy.

29 December 2013 | 15 replies
If at the examination level it is apparent that fraud was committed it can be turned over to an appropriate law enforcement agency, the Sheriff or State Troopers, but it could be FBI, FDIC, Treasury Dept. or HUD, depending on the matter, they all carry guns and badges, you get to go for a ride and based on the facts at hand, well you can guess.

29 December 2013 | 9 replies
OK, underneath it all i know you are right; I'm not a law breaker.

31 December 2013 | 19 replies
I.E, they have no tenants rights because they are not on the lease, be wary though there are some common laws regarding squatters.

30 December 2013 | 9 replies
If the state laws allow(or not) assignment of contracts that will be the decision maker.

18 August 2019 | 19 replies
There are actually laws for this for most mortgages made after July 29th, 1999.