So to keep it simple, I would grab 100 homes for 3.5 mil, which would bring me 150k-190k/ monthly Net.

very simple your acquasition costs are in many case a fraction of CA.. in many cases you can buy a home for the same price as the downpayment required in CA and other high priced markets.. this is the main draw.And also the thought process that rental properties MUST throw off positive cash flow the higher the % return the better WITH minimum down IE 20 to 25%.. 

Just keep it simple - the tenancy is not being renewed, please move out by the end of September.

The secret to success as an agent, the recipe on how to become a Top-Producer and STAY one, as I am, is actually very simple, BE THAT VALUABLE.

They're pretty simple.

You have to pay more than what a cash buyer will pay, it's that simple. 20% down is solid, but cash is better and easier and more secure.

Even with my research, this one doesn't seem logical if the borrower has equity but I am hoping I am missing MANY different reasons why it's not as simple of a solution for the borrower as I have laid out.Thank you!

Boots on the ground - You really can't avoid the fact that eventually you will need someone to go to the property and do something simple. 

Paying simple interest on access to equity only when you need it sure beats locking in 30 years of higher interest-first payments with a cash-out. 

Have gotten derailed 3 times now at the last minute with the simple message "our risk department will not open up a business account that is owned by an IRA".