I talk to investors every day who were lured by the appeal of excellent cash flow, only to have it eaten up by turnovers and vacancy and are having a hard time selling a few years later because appreciation wasn't what they hoped.  

I know this is a passionate subjectI think the issue is the business owner (landlord) should be free to assess the risk themselves on an individual basis. 

What I suggest is legal and done every day.

Cash loses value everyday.

I'm getting the pattern of late rent on a regular basis, offer to let him break the lease to find something less expensive, and give his security deposit back as long as the place is tenant able.. end it with something like unfortunate if rent is late as a business I will be forced.to seek the legal remedies. 

If you apply for 1 scholarship every day until you graduate, I’d say you’re chances are pretty good.

Terms on investor loans are not much different than owner occupant...20% down vs 25% and maybe 50 basis points difference in the rate. 

To clarify: You mentioned appreciation of $800k But gain will be Calculated as:Sale price <Less> Adjusted basis (purchase price + purchase costs- depreciation)<Less> Improvements you made <Less > Selling costs 

Non ad valorem would be taxes that are evenly applied to all properties regardless of value on a per-property basis, commonly for community road improvements, new fire stations, CDD (community development district), or other items like that which impact a small part of the county which those seeing benefit repay over a period of time.

Did you ask about any other bills they have to pay on a monthly basis , etc.