It may be good for CRM.When I said bad data..Many of the properties e.g. failed listings failed two years back..filters don't produce correct reports, MLS listings are incorrect- seems like they dont refresh regulalry, equity and rate seems like guesses.Having said that I still believe it may be the best of all.Thanks for your responseQuote from @Justin Silverio: @Sandeep Dhall I'm curious what you mean by bad data. 

@Eduard Gibert Renart - Interest-only notes would produce a consistent yield.Another strategy is to buy discounted notes.

I’m sure they exist somewhere, but the vast majority of small businesses just don’t generate the income nor the margins to hire the quality of people nor the specialized skills needed to produce without the involvement of the owner willing to wear many different hats, pick up the slack where needed, and work the hours necessary to make the business a success. 

Like for me I have a business I enjoy that produces active income I don't see myself stepping out of anytime soon, so I am prioritizing the nicer areas/properties that might not cash flow as much right now but will in the future and provide me with good depreciation to offset active income right now.Just such a personalized thing that doesn't have a one size fits all approach.  

There are only about 100 to maybe 150 of these properties produced per year. 

if so, this had high risk written all over it for all parties, as in todays market it is very rare to find properties that will produce positive cash flow with 100% leverage.  

If it's permissible then the #1 feature for top producing STR's is proximity to water.

It's a means of producing income, not long-term wealth. 

Even if you found a deal for $200,000 that produces $9,000 a month income, that's a complete unicorn that you probably found off-market.

But if you go to his web site he claims he built an empire of $145 million in the last 48 months.