![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/990737/small_1621506969-avatar-rhett_z.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 April 2018 | 7 replies
You wouldn't want to expose the rental assets to the risk of Flips ( contractor falling off the roof).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/604747/small_1694726531-avatar-richardf65.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 March 2018 | 4 replies
Don't put in open shelves - the area is too deep and they would just look messy - and I don't like that exposed plumbing on the back wall.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/480803/small_1694634232-avatar-panduc.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 March 2018 | 13 replies
Essentially they become an investor in a larger property (multi-family, self storage, etc), receiving a preferred return every month with ZERO action required while still staying exposed to the real estate market.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/208486/small_1621433308-avatar-michael_plaks.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
20 March 2018 | 8 replies
Based on “substance over form” principles, it ruled that the IRA did not really own Roth Inc for two main reasons:• The IRA’ were exposed to no significant risk; and• An independent person in the IRA’s shoes could not realistically have expected a benefit.Since the IRA did not really “own” Roth Inc, the income really belonged to the taxpayer – and putting that money into the IRA resulted in a taxable “excess contribution”.More specifically, the court held that a $500 investment, absent any other significant risk, does not give rise to any real risk for the IRA.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/826302/small_1623349722-avatar-petew13.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
21 March 2018 | 2 replies
I don't want to expose my family to unnecessary risk/leverage, but I also want to build on the momentum.I would be very grateful to hear the thoughts of this community on how to stay on the gas and not hit the breaks for at least a year and risk losing any momentum.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/144168/small_1621419210-avatar-rych416.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
13 April 2018 | 5 replies
You not only have a safety issue, but your insurance company may not insure you if something was too happen, you have a code enforcement issue, and you are exposing yourself to legal issues if someone gets injured up there.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/725352/small_1621496165-avatar-chris__vel.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 April 2018 | 9 replies
Exposed electrical throughout the home.6.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/725352/small_1621496165-avatar-chris__vel.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
14 April 2018 | 3 replies
Exposed electrical throughout the home.6.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/922082/small_1695773628-avatar-lakshmic1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
5 February 2020 | 5 replies
If you are not familiar with real estate at all, you are exposing yourself to significant risk.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/641462/small_1621494460-avatar-joz1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
27 April 2018 | 134 replies
Being left without insurance and thus potentially exposing yourself/your business to increased personal/business liability as a result is NOT a "reasonable accommodation".