
4 February 2008 | 5 replies
… My answer is no… Time = Money… And I bet when all said and done… You will stick so much time into it that you would find that it is not worth it!

26 June 2008 | 5 replies
I bet you could get more for it if it's a SFH because your selling to someone that wants to live there.

20 February 2008 | 12 replies
I bet it's warm over there...

6 April 2009 | 8 replies
If you are planning to use a commercial loan, the rules change quite a bit. 75-80 percent LTV is your best bet to avoid down payments.

21 July 2008 | 18 replies
California always has been a good bet for real estate....Yes we are seeing many shorts sales and foreclosures etc even in Cal but when the market hits bottom there will be plenty of people out there in position to pick up those $1.2M homes two years ago for $600k!!

6 February 2008 | 10 replies
So they look to rent it out and at least offset some of the expenses not to mention making the property safer by it not being vacant.This means that renters (just like sellers were just a year or two ago) can make demands for things.

11 February 2008 | 14 replies
I bet you could find a couple on here.

12 February 2008 | 10 replies
Don't get me wrong... there are valid reasons... but if you don't know why you'd hang on to a money-losing property, then your best bet is probably to get rid of it.

25 March 2008 | 7 replies
I say that your best bet would be to find a probono attorney if you can not afford one yourself.

27 February 2008 | 6 replies
Sorry, I know you addressed the question to Mike, but I bet you he'd agree.