Cityrent to value (higher is better)rent to income (lower is better)taxes to value (lower is better)insurance to value (lower is better)Avg Annual Appreciation (higher is better)unemployment (lower is better)Crime/US Avg: 280 (lower is better)population growth (higher is better)Atlanta0.4121.10.412.29%6.15911.98Cleveland12.422.21.19-1%6.3847-0.52Memphis0.882.21.841.170.827.3802-0.27Kansas City0.581.671.360.811.855.27070.22Indianapolis0.651.871.080.731%4.46490.33Minneapolis0.391.651.280.512.825.85590.86 thats kind of a random sampling if your going to do this why don't you do this for every major MSA in the US and then compare.. you missed many good markets and others were apprciation is much more prevelant.

Pricy at 2.79 sq foot but samples look good.   

That flooring looks to be very common, as I am almost positive I have seen it before, you might take a road trip to Home depot and bring a bunch of their flooring samples back to the property and see if they match. 

My challenge to anyone in CA, specifically the Bay area, is to post a link to the methodology used in the "study".

@Shweta Bharti - I can speak from the selling side of Roofstock that may provide some value (I've only listed 3 properties so not a huge sample size). 

@Steve Morris - it appears to be a biased sample.

However the larger population sampling you have the more **** ups you get.

Tenants - I have some great tenants and some bad ones, still 7 units over 2 years is not a large sample but doesn't look like anything unusual3.

Good luck proving in court a urine smell, would you bring a carpet sample?  

I'm going to look into this method using your methodology even with the higher interest rates to see if it's advantagous to me.