That type of deal is not hard to find but you have to put some skin in the game.

She's got some skin in the game and will probably take decent care of it. 

They have more skin in the game then you do.Make sure you get clear title.

If you sound an amazing deal and all in you were at like 50% LTV, then maybe, but otherwise lenders are going to want you to have some skin in the game.

I listened to Chad’s podcasts, read his book Retire Early with Real Estate (published by BP), and reached out to another podcaster who gave him a glowing recommendation as a person and investor.

I can't wait until my opportunities inevitably grow once I get some skin in the game.

Likewise, if / when 'tenant C' had moved in, they should have paid the tenant that stayed for 1/2 of the security deposit to where they both have some 'skin in the game' to maintain the unit, reimbursing her those funds.  

A borrower is much more likely to walk away from a deal with no skin in the game, and lenders aren't in the business of flipping houses.If you can get a conventional loan, go for it. 

Borrowers always need skin in the game. 

So a sponsor that's great for one investor will probably be terrible for another (and vice versa).I'm a conservative investor, so when I invest in multi-family I prefer sponsors that have at least one full real-estate cycle of experience, little to no money lost, low leverage, and high skin in the game.And there is an apartment operator that has multiple real estate cycles of experience (decades) with no money lost, low 65% less LTV, and high 10%+ skin in the game.They market under 506B so are prohibited from posting publicly on the Internet and instead function by referrals.