I could see rational reasons for doing it either way depending on the nature of the investments and personal liquidity situation.For example, if you were pulling a good wage and had savings you could make up for hiccups/shorfalls, so you may want the lower rate even with the bigger payment (your return would be greater).

They take full consideration of the strong positive feed back nature of the real estate market and chase the momentum without fear, the same way they have done to the stock market.

The results showed my natural way of working (my instincts) were that of an Entrepreneur.

Over the long run wages, rents, etc. should all follow inflation naturally north.

Teachers many times are naturally good at this but women have a more natural ability to work with the average home buyer.

I prefer people who are collaborative by nature, and show a win-win philosophy in how they communicate.

It's just the nature of the beast and when you have done this as many times as I have and have say through executive session enough, you learn the nuances of this very niche within the HOAs.

Liquid by nature.

Now my assumption is that because the property in a developing area it will naturally have a lower risk of A) apartment not renting B) taking a hit on the property value.

Depending on what the ultimate disposition strategy is, California can have barriers of execution as many loans quickly exceed conventional standard loan amounts becoming jumbo in nature.