data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3138/e31383e9968e3e21856d82c940ad1a86c05b1b1d" alt=""
9 February 2014 | 75 replies
In those cases where objections still existed, then the assurances were given as to our participation and abilities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb058/eb058807b421971d6b0c229662b5a6afab079b33" alt=""
16 January 2014 | 1 reply
The judgment recovery company goes through years of time to recover some of what's owed and it's a grind.You can sit on a judgment and it keeps growing and you renew it depending on state laws until one day the debtor has the ability to pay and possibly contacts you for a settlement.The 50/50 is the judgment company typically spends their own money and what is recovered over time is split 50/50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc823/cc82372df1f75967def89b81d9b1de49e9975cc1" alt=""
3 July 2014 | 9 replies
When you do a lease option assignment you- 1. investigate the tenant buyer well from their past tenant history 2. the tenant buyer should go through a RMLO with the new Safe Act and Dodd Frank Act, because you are protecting the Seller that the TBer has the ATR (Ability to Repay) a loan.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb141/bb141e702cd6ea5020ce0989160b21eaf169aae1" alt=""
17 January 2014 | 10 replies
Just beware that it's not easy to predict the future so research those growth assumptions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3138/e31383e9968e3e21856d82c940ad1a86c05b1b1d" alt=""
17 January 2014 | 2 replies
I feel this would be a very solid investment based on location, condition, ability to upgrade...oh and its only a block from my house (which I'm happy with).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7471/b7471b02b60bf4b58433052aca730be9db9fc015" alt=""
17 January 2014 | 6 replies
We're not trying to "get rich quick" Just be responsible with our assets and abilities.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d5a/71d5ae9613141d5eddc405bef66d22d46449d593" alt=""
26 May 2014 | 10 replies
For single-purchase raises for a specific asset it seem that best from the perspective of the promoter would be defined as:Least transaction costs and friction for presenting deal to investorsBroadest possible audienceLowest cost of capitalAdequate protection from lawsuits or legal risk both at the time of subscription and on a go-forward basisHighest likelihood of finding or maintaining relationships with investors for the longest period of time possible The motivation for a blind pool would be largely the same, but one would place more emphasis on the ability to forge long-lasting relationships with investors so they'll continue to invest in future placements or deals in general.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46e3b/46e3b8aa38807cd35d62fa8f87094d5add341d85" alt=""
18 January 2014 | 18 replies
I'd say though if you have $100k-150k, you could buy a newer property in a higher growth market.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b728d/b728d2252396591e3c38c58f523043bf67e904ed" alt=""
3 April 2014 | 4 replies
The ability to set up defaults (such as cash offer, closing 10 days after contract date, no inspection contingency, etc) would be great as well.Does anyone know of something like this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca688/ca688cbe4dc84bf97a6c29f5f27898fd1dbdedbd" alt=""
6 June 2013 | 12 replies
Have not looked at Frederick and Hagerstown but there is a lot of business growth up that way.