If you do not stick to the lease you should remove the language from your next tenants lease.He will leave regardless so you may as well inform him of his costs up front.

Not to mention, lenders talk a different language.

If the first-lien mortgagee does not consent to the second lien, you are technically in breach of the language by getting a second lien mortgage.

If competency is an issue, you may have bigger fish to fry.In re: probate, you can use sub-2 language to make closing conditional on probate outcome and ability to convey fee simple title to 100% of the house. 

@Jeanni Prescan and @Alex DeaconHere's the relevant language in the statute:(f) The notice provided for in this section may be served personally on the tenant, or by leaving the same at the principal building upon the premises, or by posting the same conspicuously on the leased premises.So certified mail doesn't work under the statute.

Like Oregon they are not legal.check with you title and escrow company they will tell you if they do any.. if they do none its probably not done there if they say yes we do them all the time.. then your probably OKyour lawyer will put language in that allows the co bene's to foreclose very common.. but you do want to have that in writing up front..  

@Ada Tor the language in CCRs that specifically bans short term rentals usually reads something like this "No unit shall be rented for a term of less than 30 days". 

Going over the term sheet, I saw language in a footnote that said I don't have to pay a deposit if I use Sharestates title company.

We would also be  interested in example of contract language if anyone has that to share.  

You should also consider language as to what happens with taxes, insurance, escrow funds, etc...