How are landlords in SF handling the security deposit law that requires them to pay interest to residents on their deposits?

The capital invested by the borrowers was in the form of either, or a combination of: (1) additional deposits into interest and/or renovation reserves; (2) the purchase of a new rate cap; (3) a principal paydown of the loan and (4) bringing any delinquent loans current by paying past due interest owed.

The lease termination fee needs to be paid at the time they request this, do not substitute the security deposit for this purpose.This will ensure compensation for time, money and effort needed for a tenant turnover, including advertising and showing costs, regular repairs, utilities during vacancy etc.

I can always make deposits/contributions into the SDIRA though.

The “tales” of nothing down/seller subordinates “down payment” done successfully almost always hide the most important information - that the buyer either provided additional collateral (such as real property owned “free and clear”, a certificate of deposit in an amount greater than the down payment required, or the buyer is financially strong enough that part of the financing was in effect a personal loan or line of credit. 

The vast majority of lawsuits against Landlords are for wrongful eviction, security deposit disputes, and Fair Housing Violations.

We don’t bother with security deposits, so there’s no recourse against the outgoing tenant who destroyed the furniture that was ‘new’ (meaning great condition off of Craigslist) just a year prior.

We canceled the contract, returned his earnest money deposit, and put the property back on the market.

They've been fabulous from the very beginning, responsive, polite, paid their first month's rent and deposit early, etc.

Think of all the things that could go wrong and see if the lease addresses them: unauthorized pets or tenants, early termination, security deposit, lease violations, late rent, eviction, lawn maintenance, parking, etc.5.